“The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the National Weather Service.”
I want to shorten these discussions (and still failed). There has not been any change in the overall spatial patterns of tropical and extratropical SSTs. The following are links to SST information, including an ENSO posting by the WMO. As stated by the latter, careful monitoring (including subseasonal atmospheric variability – my part) is critical during the next several months for the future of ENSO. Again, I emphasize that I am discussing the interannual aspect of coupled ocean-land-atmosphere variability where ENSO is a component.
http://www.wmo.int/pages/prog/wcp/wcasp/enso_update_latest.html
http://iri.columbia.edu/climate/ENSO/currentinfo/technical.html
http://www.pmel.noaa.gov/tao/jsdisplay/
http://www.cdc.noaa.gov/forecast1/IndoPacific.frcst.html (note the initial projection)
http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/precip/CWlink/MJO/index.primjo.html (link 18)
http://www.cdc.noaa.gov/map/images/sst/sst.long.time.gif
Full disk satellite imagery shows multiple regions of enhanced tropical convection. Loosely, these are centered from the equatorial western Indian Ocean into the Eastern Hemisphere monsoon systems, the west central Pacific and in the region of the
The extratropics have contributed to the eastward shift of tropical convective forcing. Included are north-south mountain massifs, having broadly positive global mountain torque events of ~20 Hadleys late May, mid-June and most recently. The latter involved the Southern Hemisphere mountain ranges such as the Andes and those over
Complicated interactions of processes briefly mentioned above have worked to add westerly wind flow to the global atmosphere. For example, zonal mean westerly wind flow anomalies of ~5m/s have shifted off the equator into the Northern Hemisphere subtropical atmosphere. There was also a (very) slight transient reversal of upper tropospheric tropical circulation anomalies across the Eastern Hemisphere a few days ago (~24 June), with twin cyclones trying to evolve in the region of the
There is evidence of some tropical-extratropical coupling returning. The WH (2004) MJO and WB (2007, 08) GWO plots are starting to line up in phase space; ~ octants 8-1-2-3 are probable during the next few weeks. Support for this notion includes a negative global frictional torque (~10 Hadleys – GWO component) and a few predictions (ex., POAMA and ECMWF) of the WH (2004) RMM index to orbit to phase 3 by week-3. Physically this means a return to a La-Nina base state and/or a re-enforcement of a stationary low AAM regime that has been present for at least the past year. Seasonal implications are still unclear. The point is that the atmosphere is orbiting in phase space around what may still be the “La-Nina attractor”. This evolution is the foundation for subseasonal predictive information offered below.
In my last posting I suggested a western/northwestern
As all models now show (the GFS has been playing catch-up), an amplified western
Intense to severe tropical thunderstorm activity is probable to increase from the Indian Ocean into the monsoon and frontal rain band systems of
Other severe/high impact weather continues internationally. I trust the expertise of the appropriate weather centers to alert the public of additional weather hazards worldwide.
Appendix
An experimental quasi-phase space plot of the GSDM utilizing time series of normalized global relative AAM time tendency (Y-axis) and normalized global relative AAM anomaly (X-axis) can be found at
http://www.cdc.noaa.gov/map/clim/gsdm.shtml
This phase plot is being re-done, as is the web site. Stay tuned. We call the behavior of this plot the Global Wind Oscillation (GWO). While the intent of the legacy GSDM is to extend current thinking beyond the MJO, the GWO quantifies variations used to derive the original GSDM in a manner that is “user friendly” analogous to the WH (2004) “convention”. In addition, the GWO plot does not have the ENSO signal removed.
Please see the revised description of the GSDM per above link -- which will be revised again (work in progress)!!!. Also, I encourage the readers to study the annotated MJO and GWO phase space plots to help relate the global variations explained by those techniques to “weather”.
Links to CPC and PSD ENSO discussions:
http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/products/analysis_monitoring/enso_advisory/index.shtml
http://www.cdc.noaa.gov/people/klaus.wolter/MEI/
The following is a link to information about the stratosphere and other nice monitoring tools:
http://ds.data.jma.go.jp/tcc/tcc/products/clisys/index.html
The following is a link to NCEP model verifications (surf around for lots more)
http://www.cpc.ncep.noaa.gov/schemm/z500ac_wk2_na.html .
The following is a link discussing recent global weather and related events.
http://www.wmo.ch/pages/mediacentre/news/index_en.html
These are probabilistic statements, and work is ongoing to quantify in future posts (for example, risk assessment maps, signal to noise ratio plots and shifts of probability). We hope that an opportunity will arise for us (soon) to have a dedicated web page effort to expedite more objectively, with rigor, thoroughness and verification. This web page effort would hopefully include an objective predictive scheme for the GWO, including hindcasts.
The WB (2007) paper on the GSDM has been published in the February issue of MWR. In addition, the first of a two-part paper has been submitted to MWR where WB formally introduces the GWO. A pdf version can be downloaded from the following link
http://www.cdc.noaa.gov/map/clim/wb08_final.pdf
Overlapping seasonally varying subseasonal composites for variables such as surface temperatures and streamfunction anomalies are planned on being posted on the web site mentioned above and presented in part-2 of our paper. We want to emphasize notions such as global-zonal mean-regional scale linkages as well as forcing-response-feedback (with subsequent interactions) relationships. An important purpose is to provide a dynamical weather-climate linkage framework to evaluate the numerical models in a sophisticated manner as part of a subseasonal (and any time scale) forecast process. Relying on the numerical models alone is a cookbook!
Given shift work and travel, updates are extremely difficult. I hope to post another discussion the weekend of 4-6 July.
Ed Berry